FANDOM


There is an umpteen number of speech-to-text applications and technology trending in the market today. However, each of them have their own perks and benefits. The technological giant Google first launched its voice recognition tool in June 2011. Following which it opened a new avenue of possibilities for mobile and laptop users. Apple, too, was nagged to an edge to launch Siri in the following months. Speech technology was booming and was predicted to reach all-time fame under a decade. This overwhelming response from users around the world was soon beginning to catch the world by storm. Numerous companies began exploring speech technology; rolling out one speech AI after the other.

However, in this article, its Google versus MySteno, a virtual stenographer that offers its users seamless voice to text conversion. A war between a giant and the underdog in the world of technology & speech. The million dollar question is, who really has the edge over the other?

The Powerful World of Google and its Speech Technology:

 With the ease of its Application Programme Interface otherwise known as the API, Google’s speech technology helps convert voice-to-text by making use of its large neural matrix. This powerful API identifies not just one vernacular but 120 and counting. With several other features that make speech-to-text so easy, the following are its top ten functions.

  1. Multichannel Identification

This feature is very useful when a number of people are participating on a call say from a phone, a laptop, a desktop or a tab. In such an instance, it identifies each of the mediums individually so that they accompany the same channel in reality. This feature makes the group calls a breeze.

2. Auto-Detect Language

When the user belongs to a multilingual group, Google’s cloud speech-to-text will automatically recognise the right language spoken.

3. Real-time Streaming or

Prerecorded Audio Support In real-time streaming, audio can be supported by an app’s mike, creating the channel for numerous

Audio data encryption.

4. Phrase Hints

A gadget such as a mobile phone or any application that supports voice recognition has a set of inbuilt language and phrases that may be spoken by the user. These are called phrase hints.

5. Speaker Diarization

Speaker Diarization in the cloud speech-to-text impulsively anticipates a spoken remark and by who it was spoken by.

6. Model Selection

This offers four types of in-built configuration such as voice commands and video transcription just to name a few.

7. Automatic Punctuation

The punctuation feature inserts a comma, full-stop, etc automatically accurately and efficiently.

8. Global Vocabulary

Has multiple sets of vocabularies inbuilt in its AI that recognises more than 120+ languages and its modifications.

9. Inappropriate Content

Filtering Effectively recognises and filters unnecessary content that may arise for certain dialects and languages.

10. Automatic Speech Recognition

The powerful neural matrix of the Automatic Speech Recognition clouts the identification of what is being said when the user communicates and funnels information using speech.

Google Speech Technology & Legal Industry:

 Google’s speech technology has been used by several apps to configure its speech-to-text AI. These apps are excellent on their own merits and offer their users effortless working and productive days. Additionally, lot’s of time saved. Most of these apps powered by google are open to any professionals. However, for a niche industry like the legal sector, they may not be offering a well-rounded solution.

Any lawyer, legal or a paralegal who is looking to save time will definitely need legal accuracy, especially for legal documentation. Legal terminologies when spoken may not be the easiest terms to capture by an AI. Therefore, leading to misunderstandings of the uttered words. To save lawyers from the trouble of legal drafting, MySteno was created.

MySteno- The Virtual Stenographer - A saviour for lawyers

 Notwithstanding whether we take a gander at law understudies or lawful experts, if there is one thing in like manner crosswise over everybody in the legitimate field, it must be the weight of gathering due dates and heaps of desk work. In the midst of this turmoil, there is research to do, cases to look-into, refreshes from customers and court systems, all of which require correspondence and composing.

Over and above, there is always legal drafting. Drafting is one of the most significant tools of the legal profession. Drafting is used to advocate, persuade, inform and instruct. But most of the lawyers struggle a lot during the drafting. Although mastering legal drafting takes practice and time, superior writing skills are crucial to success, and one should take step by st and to improve the same.

This is where an app Like MySteno bridges the gap. A voice-to-text convertor, it seamlessly converts speech to text and understands a legal expert the best. With its AI repository filled with 2000+ legal maxims and abbreviations, it understands lawyers the best.

 Let’s see the top functions of Mysteno below:

It is completely adjusted to Indian legalese: Unlike Google decipher and a large group of remote applications which are intended for general use, Steno has the interesting capability of being customized to suit the Indian law. In this way, while voice-composing can be bulky in the multipurpose application, simply saying the LLP Act would compose the words Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 in your content substance. Hence, the combination with Indian laws, condensings and methods makes legitimate transcription helpful.

It is quicker than some other method of correspondence Lawyers regularly connect with a stenographer to take notes in shorthand and later sort it out, which is then edited and changes made after audit. This confused methodology can without much of a stretch be made increasingly productive through voice-composing, as you can direct, read, survey and make changes, all together, lessening the all out time included altogether.

Upgraded proficiency and more noteworthy center – When we have a lawful device available to us, it prompts more prominent productivity in the working environment as one can expand time and vitality better. We can have different tabs open on a similar workstation, with no requirement for numerous gadgets or individuals. While perusing various sites and looking into cases in books for lawful research, survey and investigation, one can persistently be managing on the voice to content apparatuses. Along these lines, there is no compelling reason to request that a stenographer keep up various documents or hang tight for your directions while you look into another wellspring of research, making work simpler, better and quicker.

Decreased odds of blunder with Steno, being a coordinated apparatus for voice acknowledgment has worked in Grammar and Citation check include and would, in this manner, help discover mistakes and deficiencies that a human stenographer will most likely be unable to spot. Rather than having a stenographer to peruse for all to hear what we've effectively managed, we can peruse the content appropriate on our screens and begin effectively from where we left.

Quicker and orchestrated research – While chipping away at your workstation, having a concurrent instrument that is preparing your transcription into an archive, it is such a great amount of simpler to glue case substance being alluded to from a legitimate web crawler, or citing and cross-referencing articles, accordingly sparing us from the issues of guile of reports and assessing the draft on different occasions.

It is fundamentally less expensive A stenographer particularly prepared in shorthand and composing would request a similar pay, adding a bit to the month to month costs. This expense can without much of a stretch be limited by putting resources into a wise device like MySteno, which is adjusted to both internet browser and versatile applications, making voice-to-content composing in a hurry a probability.

 

The Verdict:

 Both are extremely capable and too much brisk. The Mysteno application takes just 20 minutes to wrap up a ten-page record which would take manual transcribers around 2 hours to cut down. It types as you talk, helping you save so much time and effort, the two of which can be used for continuously critical things.

With everything taken into account, both the stages are likewise forceful. While Google may beat MySteno to the extent the amount of maintained tongues, it does exclude a custom vocabulary and complement elective like MySteno, making them uncommon and exceptional meanwhile. In explicit respects, they are fundamentally the same as, for instance, concerning the essential handiness and associations. As the MySteno application is developed recalling legitimate guides, it has a couple of additional features, for instance, the choice to coordinate complements using AI at whatever point required, however Google does not reinforce this handiness. It's AI in like manner stores in excess of 2000 Legal abbreviated structures and adages making it less complex than at some other time to draft definitive reports. It moreover has the extra component of outfitting the customer with the chance to change over the word report to a PDF which can be speedily displayed, making it the best application for supporters and law understudies.

Practically, the two phases offer various focal points to manual elucidation and are consequently causing in pushing voice-to-content advancement. It will interest see how they organize later on and to see whether new tech will empower one to overpower the other.

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.